Now, as it turns colder by the day, and sometimes getting warner by the day, but, in general terms, getting definitely colder, I am happy to be lazy in the warmth afforded by the commendable heating in my room, and read novels, most of which were purchased for a steal from The Book People. And it is on my readings that this scrap will focus on, and the topic I have chosen for myself is the Man Booker Prize 2008, which was awarded ultimately to the magazine columnist and debutant novelist Aravind Adiga, originally from my home town: the city of Chennai (erstwhile Madras) in the South East coast of India. More specifically, I am going to write about three novels, all describing India, of the present, of 150 years ago and of the 17th century. One of the three won the Booker award, another made the shortlist and the third failed to make the shortlist to the surprise of many but not all. In writing this entry, every effort is made not to reveal anything that would spoil the pleasure of anyone reading or planning to read any of the novels discussed below. In fact, the only step I will take towards that end is to say not much more than what one can gather by reading the inner side of the front flap of the hardback editions of these novels.
Book 1: Aravind Adiga, The White Tiger, Atlantic Books: a powerful indictment of the two Indias of today - one of the cities and the other of the "Darkness", of the remote villages, one village whose blessing or the scourge is the muck of the holy Ganges; one of the rich, bribery-capable "entrepreneurs" and of the "drivers", who are not employed only as drivers - "the rich don't have drivers, cooks, barbers and tailors. They simply have servants". The author does seem to pass on a message to his readers - the infectivity of corruption and bribery, a way of life whose web does not let escape the progressive master just returned to India following progressive education in the progressive USA or the naive driver, or rather servant, from the Darkness. The interactions between the progressive master, his corrupt-to-the-root brother and the naive servant and his community of other, for want of a better word, satanic servants are dealt with with exceptional sensitivity and make for pulsating reading. The novel is set in the form of a letter being written by The White Tiger, the freak servant of the progressive master, to the Chinese Premier prior to the latter's visit to India. I read a customer review somewhere - probably Amazon - that said that this aspect of the novel rings rather untrue. I beg to differ from this opinion because I strongly feel that this is the defining aspect of the novel - an Indian individual, who has seen both sides of the India in the course of a couple of affecting decades, writing to the Premier of the country's neighbour, which is seen as his own country's competitor, about what lies underneath the glossy cover pages of India. Having said that, I am not sure that the novel is creative enough, or "literary enough" (the latter is pardonable since it is the writing of a poorly educated former servant and now entrepreneur) to have won what is probably the most prestigious award for a work of fiction. It is more a spiced up documentary and notwithstanding the excellent presentation, the story itself holds no surprises. Further - this may be seen as a strength or a liability depending on your own view of things - there is not a single character in the novel with whom I am able to sympathise. According to the Booker committee 2008, this was the best novel coming out of the Commonwealth in 2008. It is definitely a very good one - underline the very - but I would have been very disappointed if none of the other shortlisted books were any better, in terms of creativity and its ability to pull me into the story, forcing me to gobble up page after page, hurtling towards a much-anticipated climax, irrespective of the number of pages to be consumed in getting there, while not compromising on the beauty of the language that is the medium of communication. Hoping against hope, I opened the other India book to have made the shortlist..
Book 2: Amitav Ghosh, Sea of Poppies (Part I, Ibis Trilogy), John Murray: A terrific historic novel based largely in Bengal and the "Black Water" of the Bay of Bengal: what lies beyond where the Ganges ends in the Sunderban estuary, bringing together a colourful cast of native, English and French characters and men born for sailing. This novel is an epic: it runs for nearly 500 pages of a tall hardback, but once you start reading it, you cannot but go through it and wrap it up in two days and hope that the author brings out the second book of the planned trilogy soon. It is founded on the first of the Opium Wars by which the West forced China to accept import of Opium, produced in the factories of Eastern India, which was, as I gather from another source, the second largest source of cash for the East India Company in India after land revenue. The novel tells the story of Ibis, the once slave-transporting double-masted schooner bought by the leading Opium trader in India, a Mr. Burnham; it tells the story of Deeti, a woman married to an impotent worker at an Opium factory and whose "shrine" documents the many characters and inanimate objects of the novel in the form of caricatures and Kalua, a giant of a man belonging to a very low caste; it tells the story of Paulette, the daring daughter of a deceased French botanist, her "brother" Jodhu, a genial boatman and Zachary who is the survivor, metamorphosing from a "Black" to the Second Mate of Ibis; it tells the story of Neel, a bankrupt, convicted and disgraced Zemindar and his fellow-convict, the Parsee-Chinese called Ah Fatt; and it tells the story of the probably schizophrenic Gomusta, Baboo Nob Kissin and his search for Krishna. And all their tales are intertwined and linked together by Opium, caste-based and religious tensions in the community and profiteering from the trafficking of migrant workers. I do not want to say any more for the fear of leaking out more than I should - I have already named more characters than what you would get to gather from the story's official gist - and would leave you to buy or borrow the book, read it and long, as I do, for Mr. Ghosh to finish his next novel. And I take vain pride in the success of the novel and the thrill and enjoyment it gave me as Mr. Ghosh went to Oxford on the same scholarship (given by the Inlaks Foundation, India) that I got for my first one year of pre-PhD stay in Cambridge - never mind the fact that he won the scholarship three decades before I did! Two novels of India in the shortlist, but how can we forget one of the pre-shortlist favourites for the Booker, Sir Salman Rushdie's The Enchantress of Florence, which ended up not getting anywhere close to making top Six?
Book 3: Salman Rushrie, The Enchantress of Florence, Jonathan Cape: a cross-cultural poem, seeing parallels, contrasts and interactions straddling generations between the Mughal Court of Akbar and the tumultous Florence of Niccollo Machiavelli. One sentence from this novel reads as follows - "language upon a silvered tongue affords enchantment enough": the same should hold true of the language that flows out of the author's pen. Many reviews have been critical of the novel, for its exposition of the author's command over the language while sacrificing the pace of the story. I could agree with these critics that this novel could have been much shorer than its 350 pages, but would it have still retained the magic or its enchantment over the reader of my mentality? No. While making it absolutely clear that I do not believe that any lesser language would have done justice to the medley of thoughts in the mind of Akbar relating to his own vanity, freedom of expression, faith and his lust for his own creation: the imaginary queen Jodha, I must also go on record that at least the early chapters of Part II, dealing with Florence and the "Three Friends" could have been more concise. Beautiful is the very opening of the book describing the lake of Fatehpur Sikri - a lake which is not to be ignored by the reader - under the golden light of the setting sun, which also sees the introduction of the golden-haired traveller from Florence who seeks to find a home for himself while opening the Pandora's box of the tale of the Enchantress of Florence. The Enchantress is the fictional lost sister of Babar, Qara Koz, who leaves everyone in the wake of her youth in Persia, Turkey and Florence enchanted by her beauty, leading to the invention of tales of her sorcery and healing powers. Not just these foreign worlds that she physically enchanted, but also the city of Sikri that knows only her tale, the particularly talented painter of the court and the Emperor who is already prone to fancies and is not "content with being". Enchanting are the passages in which the above mentioned painter draws and falls in love with Qara Koz even as the tale is narrated by the foreigner. The novel is amazingly creative, effortlessly merging history with the fable to such an extent that at many points I had to search Wikipedia to make sure that what I believed was fact was fact and what was fiction was fiction. Such is the power of Sir Salman's writing and me saying any thing more about it would amount to sacrilege!
Now, the Booker Committee decided to totally ignore the Enchantress, not being impressed with those qualities that left the Great Mughal in a trance, and consider The White Tiger a better novel than Sea of Poppies and the other shortlisted books (which I am yet to read). Their decision is fully respected and I am fully aware that objectivity in judgement of art is nearly impossible. However, I am not sure that my own subjective judgement agree with that of the committee. If I were to pass a judgement on these three novels - I state once again that I have not read the other four novels in the shortlist - I would rank them as follows:
1. Sea of Poppies
2. The Enchantress of Florence
3. The White Tiger
Sea of Poppies pipping the Enchantress because the latter lost its grip over me in the middle few chapters while Sea of Poppies never did and this weighs heavier in my mind than the victory that Enchantress achieves in the spell cast by a poetic writing style.


































